Monday, January 21, 2013
McConnell Seated With Carter for Inaugural Lunch
Someone on the Inaugural Committee, or perhaps in the White House, figured out a way to torture Mitch McConnell. He and Secretary Chao will be seated with former President Jimmy Carter and wife Rosalyn at the lunch in the Capitol following the ceremonial swearing-in.
This has to be excruciating for McConnell. The whole day will be a constant reminder that our team lost. Sitting with the second worst president in the nations's history just makes it worse.
McConnell did not overlap with Carter. So there isn't any bad blood, just acute ideological differences.
Plainly, they can't talk politics. Religion and sex would not work; we don't want Carter to recall when he lusted in his heart.
Here's a topic. McConnell can ask Carter if he has been attacked by any swimming rabbits lately!
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Boehner Reelected; Massie Votes Against
Rep. John Boehner has just been reelected House Majority Leader, but not unanimously. Nine Republicans did not vote for him, including newly-sworn in Rep. Thomas Massie from Kentucky's 4th Congressional District. Massie voted for Rep. Justin Amish (R-MI).
The lack of unanimity for Boehner is fall-out for the Fiscal Cliff deal and the fact that it raised taxes on the so-called rich but failed to achieve any spending cuts at present.
McConnell on the Deal and What's Next
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has an op-ed on Yahoo! News regarding the deal he negotiated to prevent taxes going up on all Americans. Note his choice of New Media for its publication; no point in writing free copy for the opposition media.
McConnell makes clear that there will be no further discussion regarding taxes. That issue is off the table. He will focus, with his famed discipline and relentlessness, on spending.
The link to his op-ed is not working at the moment, so I have cut and pasted it in its entirety:
The first day of a new Congress always represents a fresh start.
This year, it also presents a perfect opportunity to tackle the single-greatest
challenge facing our nation: reining in the out-of-control federal spending
that threatens to permanently alter our economy and dim the prospects and
opportunities of future generations of Americans.
Earlier this week, I helped negotiate an imperfect solution aimed
at avoiding the so-called “fiscal cliff.” If I had my way taxes would not have
gone up on anyone, but the unavoidable fact was this if we had sat back and
done nothing taxes would have gone up dramatically on every single American,
and I simply couldn’t allow that to happen.
By acting, we’ve shielded more than 99% of taxpayers from a
massive tax hike that President Obama was all-too willing to impose. American
families and small businesses that would have seen painfully smaller paychecks
and profits this month have been spared. Retirement accounts for seniors won’t
be whittled down by a dramatic increase in taxes on investment income. And many
who’ve spent a lifetime paying taxes on income and savings won’t be slammed
with a dramatically higher tax on estates.
Was it a great deal? No. As I said, taxes shouldn’t be going up at
all. Just as importantly, the transcendent issue of our time, the spiraling
debt, remains completely unaddressed. Yet now that the President has gotten his
long-sought tax hike on the “rich,” we can finally turn squarely toward the
real problem, which is spending.
Predictably, the President is already claiming that his tax hike
on the “rich” isn’t enough. I have news for him: the moment that he and
virtually every elected Democrat in Washington signed off on the terms of the
current arrangement, it was the last word on taxes. That debate is over. Now
the conversation turns to cutting spending on the government programs that are
the real source of the nation’s fiscal imbalance. And the upcoming debate on
the debt limit is the perfect time to have that discussion.
We simply cannot increase the nation’s borrowing limit without
committing to long overdue reforms to spending programs that are the very cause
of our debt.
The only way to achieve the balance the President claims to want
is by cutting spending. As he himself has admitted, no amount of tax hikes or
revenue could possibly keep up with the amount of money Washington is projected
to spend in the coming years. At some point, high taxes become such a drag on
the economy that the revenue stalls.
While most Washington Democrats may want to deny it, the truth is,
the only thing we can do to solve the nation’s fiscal problem is to tackle
government spending head on — and particularly, spending on health care
programs, which appear to take off like a fighter jet on every chart available
that details current trends in federal spending.
The President may not want to have a fight about government
spending over the next few months, but it’s the fight he is going to have,
because it’s a debate the country needs. For the sake of our future, the
President must show up to this debate early and convince his party to do something
that neither he nor they have been willing to do until now. Over the next two
months they need to deliver the same kind of bipartisan resolution to the
spending problem we have now achieved on revenue — before the 11th hour.
When it comes to spending, the time has come to rise above the
special interest groups that dominate the liberal wing of the Democratic Party
in Washington and act, without drama or delay. The President likes to say that
most Americans support tax hikes on the rich. What he conveniently leaves out
is that even more Americans support cuts. That’s the debate the American people
really want. It’s a debate Republicans are ready to have. And it’s the debate
that starts today, whether the President wants it or not.
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
McConnell Was Brilliant to Hire Jesse Benton
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell's decision to hire Jesse Benton as his campaign manager already is paying off. Benton's Tea Party bona fides could not be stronger, as a former campaign manager of the Pauls.
To those Tea Party patriots who are displeased with McConnell's role in negotiating the compromise to the Fiscal Cliff, Benton reassures. For some, the deal McConnell struck looks suspect because it does raise taxes on couples above $450k without really generating much revenue -- and without immediate cuts.
This tax increase, indeed, any tax increase, exposes McConnell on his right flank. That's why Benton's explanation of the strategy behind the deal is so important, particularly with respect the bifurcated approach to making tax rates permanent so that this issue will be off the table when the negotiating turns to the debt limit:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)